From ink to e-sign: a conceptual history of the electronic signatureBy Aaron W. BrooksIntellectual Property, February 2001Amidst the Information Age and the electronic commerce revolution, it is a wonderful time to be a lawyer. Much like Thomas Augustus Watson receiving the first telephone communication in 1876, so too, we stand at the precipice of fundamental change.
Illinois appellate court embraces “inevitable disclosure” doctrine in trade secrets caseBy Steven L. BaronIntellectual Property, February 2001On December 6, 2000, the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, issued an opinion in the case of Strata Marketing, Inc. v. Murphy, No. 1-99-2749, ___ Ill.App.3d ___, ___ N.E.2d ___ (1st Dist. 2000), in which the court embraced the "inevitable disclosure" doctrine.
Academia at risk: antiquated IP policyBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, November 2000Our schools and colleges face enlarging potholes on the information superhighway because of antiquated intellectual property policies in academia. Many academic institutions have no explicit intellectual property policy; others may have established policies for inventions by faculty and researchers and trademark licensing for major college football teams.
All the rage, and a significant concernBy David LoundyIntellectual Property, June 2000Use of Application Service Providers (ASPs) is a hot topic in computer technology circles, but there are significant concerns that often get overlooked. ASPs are service providers that allow you to remotely access computer software, rather than having to purchase it yourself.
In the balance (TM): pending controversiesIntellectual Property, June 2000Is a consumer's copying music over the Internet lawful, as is copying television programs on videotape, or infringing, as the Recording Industry Association of America asserts in its suit against Napster.
TTAB Protective OrderIntellectual Property, June 2000Parties involved in inter partes proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board often enter into agreements intended to safeguard information and documents viewed as confidential, commercially sensitive or trade secret.
When is a dress trade dress? Walmart Stores, Inc. v. Samara BrothersBy Steven L. BaronIntellectual Property, June 2000On March 22, 2000, the United States Supreme Court tackled the thorny question of whether a product's design could be "inherently distinctive" so as to provide protection under trade dress theory.
A brief history of the UDRPBy Aaron W. BrooksIntellectual Property, May 2000Since January 3, 2000, all Internet domain name disputes have been governed by a single dispute resolution policy known as the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP).
Career clips: Patricia FelchBy Patricia FelchIntellectual Property, May 2000My route to an intellectual property firm has been like walking up Lombard Street in San Francisco--a 12-year trek up a very steep and spiraling hill.
IP newsBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, May 2000Work for hire quietly altered. Patricia Felch closely read the new copyright legislation and found two important, quiet changes in Title 17
Practitioner’s guide to provisional patent applicationsBy Emily MiaoIntellectual Property, May 2000Nearly five years ago, GATT-related changes to U.S. patent law led to the creation of the U.S. provisional patent application ("PPA").
Abe— A Better EssayIntellectual Property, March 2000The Intellectual Property Section of the Illinois State Bar Association has established "A Better Essay" (Abe) Program, under which faculty at Illinois law schools may submit select articles by law students for consideration for publication in the section's newsletter, "Intellectual Property."
Admiralty trademarksBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, March 2000Floating in the mid-Pacific, the record-breaking Academy Award-winning film enlightens the dark deck of the cruise ship.
Federal patent law preempts state law on inventorshipBy John M. AugustynIntellectual Property, March 2000The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that federal patent law preempts state law standards for determining inventorship.
New IP feesIntellectual Property, March 2000Some United States patent, trademark, and copyright fees have recently changed.
New law affects patents, copyrights and the InternetBy John M. AugustynIntellectual Property, March 2000On November 29, 1999, President Clinton signed a bill (H.R. 3194, Pub. L. No. 106-113) containing changes affecting patents, copyrights and the Internet.
A sales offer with product drawings did not establish on-sale validity for method patentBy John M. AugustynIntellectual Property, March 2000Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that an offer to sell a device (which included drawings of the device but not drawings of the method) did not establish on-sale invalidity because the drawings did not reveal the claimed method.
Intellectual improbabilitiesBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, November 1999DOJ antitrust guidelines for competitor collaboration. The Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission October 1, 1999 released and sought comment on proposed guidelines for lawful and illegal collaboration among competitors.
IP Q&AIntellectual Property, November 1999John Augustyn offers these questions to sharpen our patent analyses. We welcome your suggestions of interesting intellectual property questions--with your suggested answers, for publication in following issues.
Safe IP: derivative infringementBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, November 1999Obtaining a patent, copyright, or trademark is no guarantee that you do not infringe. Your patented invention may be an improvement on an earlier patented invention, and read on the earlier patent's claims
Native American tribe insignia under studyIntellectual Property, June 1999Federal law requires the Patent and Trademark Office to study a variety of issues surrounding trademark protection for official insignia of federally and state recognized Native American tribes.
Safe IP: Signing applicationsBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, June 1999Priority is often paramount in deciding trademark rights and disputes.
States gain IP immunityBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, June 1999A narrow but consistent 5-4 majority of the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that state sovereignty prevents suing a state for patent infringement or for unfair competition damages.
The hows and whys of Web site auditsBy Lynn E. Rzonca & Patricia M. DeSimoneIntellectual Property, May 1999By now your company's Web site is up and running. Monthly "hit" reports show that more and more "visitors" (read: potential clients) are accessing your site.