Practice note: Abatement of tax penalties for reasonable cause: Best practicesBy David P. DornerGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, March 2010With many states facing historical fiscal deficits and the need for additional revenues, the issue of tax penalties and the abatement of such penalties for reasonable cause have become increasingly relevant.
A review of American Airlines v. Illinois Dept. of RevenueBy William SeitzState and Local Taxation, February 2010On December 18, 2009, the First District issued its decision in American Airlines v. Illinois Department of Revenue (No. 08-2985).
Cook County’s Department of Administrative Hearings: The new kid on the blockBy Julie-April MontgomeryState and Local Taxation, January 2010In today’s litigious society, more and more matters are being initially handled outside of the courts and in administrative proceedings—specially matters that involve government enforcement, compliance and collection.
Abatement of penalties for reasonable cause: Best practicesBy David P. DornerState and Local Taxation, December 2009Every state imposes penalties for the failure to file tax or information returns or to pay taxes within the time proscribed by statute. In most instances, however, a state will abate imposed penalties if the taxpayer can demonstrate reasonable cause for the noncompliance.
Taxation of employment-related settlement paymentsBy Elizabeth Erickson & Ira B. MirskyEmployee Benefits, December 2009In an internal memorandum dated October 22, 2008, but released only in July of this year, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Office of Chief Counsel has outlined information necessary to determine the correct tax treatment of employment-related settlement payments.
Taxation by association: Amazon.com law and state taxation of Internet salesBy Scott DragoCorporate Law Departments, September 2009Historically, Internet retailers have not collected state and local sales taxes on sales made through an associate program, provided the Internet retailer itself does not have a sales force or store in a particular state. However, the days of relying on this exemption may be numbered.
Renegotiating debt? Beware of tax trapsBy Steven W. SwibelCommercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy, August 2009In a non-bankruptcy, noninsolvency context, debtors and creditors are often surprised that a debt modification that does not appear to reduce principal or the effective interest rate may nevertheless result in adverse tax consequences.
IDOR Practitioners’ meetings Q&AState and Local Taxation, July 2009Questions and answers from the recent Illinois Department of Revenue Practitioners' meeting.
Individual income tax update: Legislation, cases and rulingsBy Thomas F. Arends & Philip D. SpeicherFederal Taxation, July 2009The following outline is a summary of recent tax legislation and select cases and rulings presented by the Federal Taxation Section Council at its annual Law Ed Program, the 2009 Federal Tax Conference. The materials focus on income tax issues for individuals and sole proprietors. Also included is a summary of the newly enacted American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
Tax updates and opportunities in the current economyBy Donna F. Hartl, Justin W. Clark, & Samuel HansFederal Taxation, July 2009If utilizing any of these techniques could reduce some clients’ estate tax, then now is the time to consider implementing such a plan with the current depressed market conditions and the looming possibility that legislative action may curtail the effectiveness of these techniques.
Renegotiating debt? Tax traps for creditorsBy Steven W. SwibelCorporate Law Departments, June 2009Tax consequences of debt modification are not only a debtor’s concern. Creditors are often surprised that debt modification can result in unanticipated adverse tax consequences.
Clarification to “Inside out—Revaluation of Partnership Capital Accounts”By Michelle L. HellerFederal Taxation, March 2009In reviewing for publication the article by Derek P. Usman titled “Inside out—Revaluation of Partnership Capital Accounts” published in the December 2008 Newsletter, I started to elaborate on section 754 elections. So, to clarify, the partnership may elect under IRS section 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property “as the result of a transfer of an interest in a partnership by sale or exchange or on the death of a partner” as provided in IRC section 743.
Collection Issues and the IRS—Part IIIBy William M. GasaFederal Taxation, March 2009In addition to massive bailouts authorized by our federal government, other federal agencies have taken action to assist citizens. On January 8, 2009, the IRS issued “IRS TAX TIP 2009—Special Edition, IRS Help for Financially Distressed Taxpayers.” Because of the potential impact on everyone representing taxpayers before the IRS, the news release follows in full.