International Investment in U.S. Real Estate: Legal IssuesBy William A. PriceBusiness Advice and Financial Planning, November 2023A brief summary of legal issues developers and owners of U.S. real estate projects should consider when seeking non-U.S. investors for their projects.
An Interview With Clever CarnivoreBy Elaine VorbergFood Law, September 2023A Q-&-A with two employees of Clever Carnivor, a Chicago based start-up innovating around problems in industrial farming with cultivated meat production on a mission to make Illinois the hub of this promising industry.
Interview With Justice Rita B. Garman: Blazing a Trail for Women in LawBy Jennifer Bunker SkerstonDiversity Leadership Council, June 2023The Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism recently shared a 20-minute video on its website as part of its “Profiles in Professionalism Series” honoring Justice Rita B. Garman (ret.).
Is a Tenant Farmer Really a ‘Tenant’?By Jeffrey A. MolletAgricultural Law, January 2023An analysis of an area of law once thought to be clear cut—farm tenancy.
It Takes 12 to TangoBy Trent CameronYoung Lawyers Division, January 2023An argument for why voir dire is the most important part of a trial.
It’s a Sign of the TimesBy Sandra M. BlakeDiversity Leadership Council, June 2023A look at some of the diversity and inclusion advancements in our society.
It’s a Small World After AllBy Michael J. RooneySenior Lawyers, October 2023Reflections from a member of the Senior Lawyers Section Council's recent vacation.
Jack Daniels v. Bad Spaniels: Trademarks Are Not Abstract and Free Speech Doesn’t Mean You Can Say Anything You WantBy David C. BrezinaIntellectual Property, September 2023The U.S. Supreme Court was presented with a parody dog toy emulating the Jack Daniels whiskey trademarks and packaging. When presented with the question of whether the First Amendment defense always applied to parody use, the Court decided the case should be narrow: Where the accused use is use in commerce as a trademark—indicating the source of the goods—traditional trademark law applies and it is unnecessary to address application of a rule for artistic use.