A perspective on judicial electionsBy Hon. Wallace B. JeffersonJune 2009An argument to eliminate cynicism, money, and partisanship in judicial selection.
Proposed change in juror feesBy James R. CovingtonSeptember 2009House Bill 4002 (Mathias, R-Buffalo Grove) did not pass this spring but probably will be reintroduced in 2010. It has two main components. First, it replaces the current “jury-demand fee” with a “juror-fund fee.” This new “juror-fund fee” is assessed against the plaintiff and defendant in most civil actions to pay for an increase in juror pay. Second, it changes how jurors are called and excused.
A question of right? Jury trials in garnishment proceedingsBy Crystal CorreaSeptember 2009Garnishment orders are normally served on banks, insurance companies and other third parties that might hold assets for a judgment debtor. On occasion, third party garnishees, when filing an answer to interrogatories, also file a jury demand. But are parties entitled to a jury trial during garnishment proceedings?
Ready, the Plaintiff’s perspectiveBy Katharine ByrneFebruary 2009The Illinois Supreme Court’s opinion in Ready v. United/Goedecke Services, Inc. makes it possible for Illinois plaintiffs to enter into good-faith settlements with defendants without jeopardizing their case against a defendant that remains at trial or verdict.
Ready, the trial court’s perspectiveBy Hon. William D. MadduxFebruary 2009Recently, in Ready v. United /Goedecke Services, Inc., 2008 Ill. LEXIS 1439 (Ill. Nov. 25, 2008), the Illinois Supreme Court held that settling defendants should not be among the parties listed on jury verdict forms when those juries are asked to apportion fault.
Ready v. United/Goedecke Services, Inc.: A defense perspectiveBy Eugene A. Schoon & James R.M. HemmingsFebruary 2009In Ready v. United/Goedecke Services, Inc., the Illinois Supreme Court determined that a jury may not allocate fault to defendants who have settled prior to trial under the comparative fault provisions of 735 ILCS 5/2-1117.
Recent appointments and retirementsDecember 2009The Illinois Supreme Court, pursuant to its constitutional authority, has appointed the following to be Circuit Judge:
Settling a conflict: Excluding settling defendants from the apportionment of faultFebruary 2009On November 25, 2008, the Illinois Supreme Court resolved conflicts among and within the various Districts of the Appellate Court on whether defendants who have settled prior to trial should be included on the verdict form for the apportionment of liability.
Sunrise with Judge Sandra OtakaBy Hon. E. Kenneth Wright, Jr.July 2009The author remembers Judge Sandra Otaka, who passed away in June of 2009.
Supreme Court adopts new Rules of Professional Conduct for lawyersBy Joseph TyborJuly 2009The Illinois Supreme Court has adopted new Rules of Professional Conduct for lawyers who are licensed and who practice in Illinois. The new rules become effective January 1, 2010.
Supreme Court creates special panel on Illinois evidenceBy Joseph TyborFebruary 2009The Illinois Supreme Court has formed a Special Committee on Illinois Evidence with the aim of codifying existing evidentiary law so that it is available in a single source.
Why I keep an eye on LincolnBy Hon. Michael B. HymanJuly 2009Few historical figures are as enduring or iconic as Lincoln. And fewer still as legendary throughout the world. He has been described as “the indispensable American,” which might somewhat explain his appeal. But it does not explain all of it.
Win with civilityBy Sandra BlakeOctober 2009In 2005, the Illinois Supreme Court established the Illinois Commission on Professionalism, making Illinois one of only 14 states that have a formal body working to promote professionalism and civility.