Recent case concerning contemptBy Gary L. SchlesingerJanuary 2017The lesson from Knoll v. Coyne is that if one is seeking indirect civil contempt, one must tell the court what the purge should be. If the purpose of the contempt is punishment for violating a court order, that is criminal contempt and all the constitutional rights of a criminal defendant apply.
Rule 502: Something Illinois litigants can learn from federal courtsBy Eli Litoff, Kelly Warner, & Edward CasmereMay 2017Rule 502 sets forth several significant provisions – including 502(d) – which can be implemented by the courts and parties to proactively address production and protection of privileged material.
The Seventh Circuit rejects plaintiff’s cancer causation theoryBy Robert H. Riley & Brian O. WatsonSeptember 2017The Seventh Circuit recently rejected the plaintiff’s expert’s causation theory that “each and every exposure” or the “cumulative exposure” may satisfy the plaintiff’s causation burden.
Shakespeare’s cold wisdom—Too early seen unknown, and known too late?By Edward CasmereSeptember 2017The point of this article is not to advocate for a campaign of carpet-bombing legal briefs and arguments with quotes from Shakespeare, but rather to suggest that this giant of the literary world has gifted lawyers with timeless insights that may help us better “suit the action to the word, the word to the action” as we practice our craft.
Social media and judicial ethicsBy Hon. Steve Pacey, (Ret).October 2017A presence on social media poses potential disciplinary hazards for attorneys and perhaps more so for attorneys who are judges.
Strict Compliance with Supreme Court Rule 191(a) is mandatoryBy Albert E. DurkinSeptember 2017On August 17, the Second District Appellate Court ruled that strict compliance with Supreme Court Rule 191(a) is mandatory and that failure to attach documents relied upon in support of a 191(a) affidavit is fatal.
Summer externs = HUGE HelpBy Hon. Debra B. WalkerAugust 2017Hon. Debra Walker urges all of her judicial colleagues to host summer externs.
The Supreme Court moves proactively on attorney malpractice insurance and liability issuesBy Hon. Alfred M. Swanson, Jr. (Ret.)February 2017In an amendment to Rule 756 that took effect January 25, 2017, the Supreme Court will, starting in 2018, require lawyers to answer questions about their professional liability insurance every other year at the time they renew their authorization to practice law.
To arbitrate or to not arbitrate—That is the questionBy Hon. Fred Foreman, (Ret.) & Kathleen A. EhrhartJune 2017If a party decides arbitration is its preferred method of dispute resolution there are also a number of things it should consider in terms of how it drafts and negotiates an arbitration provision in any contract it enters into.
To disgorge or not to disgorge? That is the questionBy Emily A. HansenSeptember 2017On September 20, 2017, the Illinois Supreme Court will decide In Re the Marriage of Christine Goesel and Andrew Goesel, which will forever shape the future of interim fee awards in dissolution proceedings and will directly impact how divorce attorneys handle payments from their clients.
What federal Magistrate Judges do and why they can or can’t do itBy Hon. Tom Schanzle-HaskinsMay 2017A summary of the basic rules regarding a Magistrate Judge’s authority to rule on matters which are deemed dispositive or non-dispositive under the Magistrate Judges Act and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
What traits make for a good lawyer? What about a good judge?By Hon. Michael B. HymanJune 2017It turns out that good lawyers and good judges share what it takes to distinguish themselves and stand out among their peers. Their “good” traits are not so different from one another and are interchangeable, reciprocal, and mutual. That is, traits befitting a good lawyer apply with equal force to a good judge.
What’s been on my mindBy Hon. Michael P. Kiley, (Ret.)December 2017A personal health journey provided by retired judge Michael Kiley.